No need to concern yourself too much about it... use static or instace as you see fit.
speed difference is neglible... Davor Hrg On Feb 6, 2008 9:40 PM, Hilco Wijbenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 11:32 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > except for bind() which is static. > > Bummer! :-) > > > Just part of the strategy for deferring, or avoiding, instantiation of > > the module class. > > > > In retrospect, premature optimization. If I were starting that from > > scratch, all the methods on a module class would be static. > > I don't understand. If you say (and I would agree) that using static > is premature optimisation then why would you still want to make all > methods in a module static? With instance methods testing is much > easier. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
