Thank you for pointing that out!
Go out and vote!
Michael Lake wrote:
Rather than posting to the list, it'd probably be more helpful to vote
on the issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1304
-m
Mark Horn wrote:
I would be interested in portlet support in T5
On 1/9/08, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems like my question/thread got hijacked. Just to set the record
straight - I am not a fan of Wicket!
I'm just interested in wondering whether Portlet Support in T5 is a
wish
that more of us share - only this way, we can try to convince T5's crew
to add it in the first release.
Regards,
-J.
Jan Vissers wrote:
http://wicket.apache.org/
Apart from wicket also switching to slf4j, the new version now also
supports JSR-168/JSR-286. Apparently without changing code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cumquat Information Technology
De Dreef 19
3706 BR Zeist
T +31 (0)30 - 6940490
F +31 (0)30 - 6940499
W http://www.cumquat.nl
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M +31 6 51 169 556
B http://www.cumquat.nl/technology_atom10.xml
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
