LOL I like it. Marketing comes to the rescue once again!
On 19/12/2007, at 12:28 AM, Francois Armand wrote:
Geoff Callender wrote:
Yes, I've been thinking of doing that. Not sure what I'd do about
the elements that update the DB, though. Concurrency isn't a
problem for the system but it might be for the user experience -
when user A goes from the edit screen to the display screen of an
example they may see unexpected values thanks to user B, C and D
editing the same objects in the same example. Hmmm...
Just call the demo a "collaborative edition platform", and you are
done. Web 2.0 save us from all this transactive mess :)
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
-----------
InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/
Open Source identities management and federation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
