Yes, I want to commit this for 4.1.4... I just want to polish what i
have and send
it in till the weekend - stay tuned ;)

On 11/7/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak to whether or not you should upgrade to T5 or how stable
> it is relative to your requirements,  but can mention some things
> about Dojo versions.
>
> The packaged version of Dojo is "sort of" Dojo 0.4.3 but contains many
> local fixes not available in the official distribution - most being
> smallish bugs we've found in widgets / other things in various places.
>   I'm not saying you are guaranteed to have your problems fixed in
> this version,  but it may be worth looking at if you have the time /
> energy to do a quick glance.
>
> You can also attempt to replace the provided tapestry version with one
> of your own by overriding the AjaxShellDelegate renderer used in
> either the Shell or ScriptIncludes components:
> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/dojo/AjaxShellDelegate.html
>
> I think Andy has something up his sleeve for 4.1.4 (4.1.5?) support
> for using different javascript libraries - which could possibly mean
> you can use Dojo 0.9 or similar. .
>
> It's really not ~that~ much work to make switching javascript
> libraries possible - it's just been low on my priority list and I've
> heard Andy mentioning doing something about it so I've ignored it....
> The core supports using prototype && dojo already, it's just a
> question of those few places that have library specific knowledge -
> such as the form related javascript.  ...which I can see Andy has
> already been making generic for this purpose.
>
> I don't know,  we can try and squeeze that feature in to the 4.1.4
> release depending on what Andy has to say about it.   It's really not
> as much work as people seem to think..
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 3:55 PM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I've been using Tapestry since 2.*, and am currently working with the
> > 4.0.12 release.  I've been very happy until recently, and I guess now
> > I'm looking for reassurance/guidance.
> >
> > My issue is that Tapestry 5 is still -- it appears to me -- changing
> > significantly between releases, and I'm obviously wary of moving a
> > production application to it while it's stabilizing and still completing
> > features.
> >
> > Tapestry 4.1.* is appealing except it ships with a specific version of
> > Dojo -- I've had to rely on Subversion/manual patches to Dojo to get a
> > lot of my widgets/packages to work properly, and it appears to me that
> > Tapestry 4.1.* requires that I use the shipped version or risk foregoing
> > most of the reasons for switching to it, which would potentially screw
> > with a lot of my existing dojo-based code, and also preclude me from
> > upgrading to dojo 0.9/1.0 if I wanted or even needed to.
> >
> > Thus, I feel as if I'm in Tapestry limbo, indefinitely locked into the
> > inactive 4.0.* release-branch.  Am I suffering from misconceptions?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>


-- 
Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.andyhot.gr
Tapestry / Tacos developer
Open Source / JEE Consulting

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to