I am still on 3.03, not even 3.04 for one of my projects. When Tapestry 5 gets where it is going, then maybe we will upgrade. I think the one thing that nobody is saying is that each version of Tapestry is in production use. So, there are 3.0x in production and 4.x in production. T5 will eventually be there and if you want to impact that and remove some of the risk, have your company spend some of that "multi-millions" on T5 either by paying Howard or by devoting you or another resource to the project. Or have them do it on JSF and move on with their project. I currently have three different projects on two different versions of Tapestry. We also have another being done with JSP's...
Mark J. Stang Software Engineer office: +1 303.468.2900 Ping Identity -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 10/17/2007 9:24 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap You seriously recommending a framework in a alpha status for a multi-million dollar project ? Don't get me wrong, i like tapestry and i'am using version 4.1 in 2 projects, but i would never use alphas/betas framework without good documentation/books in production. michael petros wrote: > I am currently consulting a company that is starting a multi-million J2EE > project and it appears that I am loosing the battle of convincing them to > choose T5 over JSF. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
