There are so many possibilities! I just love it :)
andyhot wrote:
>
> exactly - and if you're able to control the display (or not) of the dialog
> you can easily go for calling the validation methods every 2-3 secs
> and displaying little green or red markers here and there :)
>
> RachelS wrote:
>> Oh, ok! I see how that fits together. Thanks for the advice!
>>
>> That's much simpler than the crazy things I was thinking...
>>
>> (At the moment I'm upgrading from Tap4.0 + Tacos to T4.1.2 and it's
>> challenging to get the stuff working the same way visually that it used
>> to.)
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Rachel
>>
>>
>>
>> andyhot wrote:
>>
>>> Not exactly sure what Jesse had originally in mind, but changing
>>> 'themes'
>>> is quite possible & even easy -
>>> You just need to override the family of methods at
>>> tapestry.form.validation
>>>
>>> Here's an example I recently used for amplafi:
>>>
>>> amplafi.presentErrors: function(miObj) {
>>> var form = miObj.args[0], results = miObj.args[1], profile =
>>> miObj.args[2];
>>> if (amplafi.showValidationDialog) {
>>> return miObj.proceed(); }
>>> }
>>> then set it up with
>>> dojo.event.connectAround(tapestry.form.validation, "summarizeErrors",
>>> amplafi,"presentErrors");
>>>
>>> So, every time tapestry.form.validation.summarizeErrors is called (which
>>> pops up the dialog) I am able
>>> to change the execution the way I want it - I also trap calls to
>>> tapestry.form.validation.processResults e.t.c.
>>>
>>> Take a look at
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tapestry/tapestry4/trunk/tapestry-framework/src/js/tapestry/form.js
>>> to get more ideas.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RachelS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can anyone shed some light as to what happened with this idea of having
>>>> a
>>>> configurable validation 'theme'?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Rachel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jessek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ......
>>>>> Not sure which release this belongs in but I've got all kinds of
>>>>> usability/humane/etc plans for validation that I'm going to want to
>>>>> try applying at some point. I'd really rather just completely remove
>>>>> this dialog but want to see how people feel about it first.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can always just make this a configurable option where you opt-in and
>>>>> choose which kind of client side validation "theme" you'd like, but
>>>>> I'm not as convinced that more options here will necessarily be
>>>>> helping people.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think/feel ?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jesse Kuhnert
>>>>> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
>>> Tapestry / Tacos developer
>>> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
> Tapestry / Tacos developer
> Open Source / JEE Consulting
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-poll--how-do-people-feel-about-me-changing-that-validation-dialog-in-4.1.1---tf2867566.html#a13135050
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
