Indeed. Are you saying that "testlib.TestComp" is considered a bug?
Personally this notation is more natural to me, and if I want to declare
a component in the template itself without instrumentation, this would
be the only syntactically valid way (vs "testlib/TestComp"). This is of
course because something like "<t:testlib/TestComp/>" is invalid XML. Is
it worth creating a JIRA and pointing out what I see as virtuous in the
"testlib.TestComp" notation?
Nick Westgate wrote:
Oops, just checked and it looks like this is correct behaviour.
"testlib.TestComp" _used_ to work, but I guess that was a bug.
Looks like Howard wants only one way to specify a component.
Pity that one way is different for tags and attributes.
Cheers,
Nick.
Nick Westgate wrote:
Howard stated previously that he considers this a bug.
Please log a JIRA.
Cheers,
Nick.
Chris Lewis wrote:
Note that this WILL NOT work:
<div t:type="testlib.TestComp"/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
