On 9/5/07, Stephan Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Although this is really not a good way to investigate a bug (lack of time), I
> still want to report that our application has been running fine since
> upgrading to "JVM 6 update 2". So it seems that it was the JVM bug Howard
> mentioned before and it is indeed fixed. If it shows up again, I'll post
> about it.

Thanks for this follow up, very much appreciated.

-- 
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to