You mean you could do something like

    <property name="hidden" initial-value="true" />
    <parameter name="hidden"/>

?? (don't think so).

Or you just refer about playing with properties and paramters?

I know there are other ways to achieve 1700 but I thought an
"initial-value" might be clearer,  just because it seems to me that
also the creatot of Dialog got confused with that :-)
To me that "default-value" instead of "default-binding" was very
confusing and I think it was the same kind of confusion.

Well, let's see if anybody think this is interesting, otherwise it was
just a good occasion for me to have a look at wonderful Tapestry code
:-)



On 8/9/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not against 1699 at all!
> I'm just saying that it's also a documentation problem
>
> As for 1700, I think the traditional way of doing something like that
> has been to declare and use both a parameter and a property... so
> i'm not sure if what you're suggesting will help or confuse users -
> waiting for
> more comments on this.
>
> Martino Piccinato wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > I do not agree, it's not just a documentation problem I've opened a
> > bug for the specific Dialog problem:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1699
> >
> > I think default use just doesn't behave the way you expect it to
> > behave (that is a bug, even though a minor one).
> >
> > But I think there's also a generic enhancement to parameters that
> > could be made that I describe in
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1700
> >
> > I think this could provide a new interesting feature and many
> > misunderstanding like the one me and Andrea (I guess) had.
> >
> > If you think it's useful I could provide some code
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/07, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, it looks like the hidden parameter is an in-out one,
> >> and it's probably that way by design I guess. The 'value' and 'index'
> >> parameters of @For
> >> work similarly but that's more straightforward after reading the docs.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I think we should just document this.
> >>
> >> Martino Piccinato wrote:
> >>
> >>> Finally I think we were both wrong and that I opened two useless tickets:
> >>>
> >>> in fact, as stated in the documentation default-value attribute now
> >>> accept any kind of binding and actually CREATES the binding if no
> >>> other binding is present.
> >>>
> >>> In your case:
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.tapestry.binding.AbstractBinding.createReadOnlyBindingException(
> >>> AbstractBinding.java:115)) when I call into my rewindFormComponent method
> >>> this code:
> >>>
> >>> setStartRow(sliderValue);
> >>>
> >>> and I set into jwc file:
> >>> <parameter name="startRow" required="no" cache="true"
> >>> default-value="ognl:0"/>
> >>>
> >>> means that at some point, during rewind, some of your code/components
> >>> is calling a "setStartRow" to update the binding but the binding is
> >>> invariant (ognl:0 is a costant!) so it's a read only binding (you
> >>> can't "change the value" of a constant) so the
> >>> ReadOnlyBindingException is correctly throwned.
> >>>
> >>> What you should do (if you really need to change the bound value) is
> >>> bind to a containing component method (e.g. value="ognl:currentRow")
> >>> that will contain the logic of when to return the default value and
> >>> when not to.
> >>>
> >>> It's also possible NOT TO BIND the parameter by default, initializing
> >>> the parameter method after the component finishLoad() phase, in your
> >>> case it would be:
> >>>
> >>> In jwc:
> >>> <parameter name="startRow"/>
> >>>
> >>> In component:
> >>>
> >>>     public void finishLoad() {
> >>>       super.finishLoad();
> >>>       setStartRow(0);
> >>>     }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The fact is that default-value with invariant values (literal,
> >>> ognl:<constant>, ecc.) make sense just if it's a read only binding, At
> >>> the same time default-value with ognl expressions referring to
> >>> containing component methods would break component encapsulation
> >>> making assumptions on the exact method signature the containing
> >>> component should implement (also its optional/default status would be
> >>> questionable...).
> >>>
> >>> As for my specific Dialog component problem I think there's still a
> >>> bug because the component IS actually trying to "write" the invariant
> >>> default-value binding in hide/show methods so after 2 invalid ticket I
> >>> hope I'm goig to open a valid one now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/30/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Posted one for the parameter issue
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1682
> >>>>
> >>>> and another one for the Dialog component:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1683
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't do it first because I was trying to investigate myself but I
> >>>> really have no time to do this now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ciao
> >>>>
> >>>> Martino
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/30/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Well, I try to investigate into this, meanwhile if you could be so kind 
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> post a jira...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ciao,
> >>>>> kiuma
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 7/30/07, Martino Piccinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, I'm having a very similar behaviour with Dialog component that
> >>>>>> by default has a true parameter for optional parameter "hidden".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     <parameter name="hidden" default-value="true" />
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It seems that if you set a constant value ("ognl:0" or "true") to a
> >>>>>> parameter then the parameter itself is regarded as "Invariant" by
> >>>>>> AbstractBinding that will refuse you to use any setter on it (it does
> >>>>>> not have a reference to a method but to a... constant) and throw the
> >>>>>> exception.
> >>>>>> I don't have the exception if I just "override" the constant default
> >>>>>> value with an ognl reference to a couple of setters/getters method
> >>>>>> (returning the default value in case the property is not initialized).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In my opinion this is a bug with "parameter" but I haven't been able
> >>>>>> to investigate more and I'm quite surprised nobody stepped into this
> >>>>>> problem before, see my neglected Dialog mails  of some days ago :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7/30/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> this is the stack trace
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> org.apache.tapestry.binding.AbstractBinding.createReadOnlyBindingException
> >>>>>> (
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> AbstractBinding.java:115)
> >>>>>>> org.apache.tapestry.binding.ExpressionBinding.setObject(
> >>>>>>> ExpressionBinding.java:196)
> >>>>>>> $EditTable_16.setStartRow($EditTable_16.java)
> >>>>>>> org.jfly.web.components.edittable.EditTable.rewindFormComponent(
> >>>>>>> EditTable.java:541)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 7/30/07, Andrea Chiumenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>> I'm having this exception (
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> org.apache.tapestry.binding.AbstractBinding.createReadOnlyBindingException
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (AbstractBinding.java:115)) when I call into my rewindFormComponent
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> method
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> this code:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> setStartRow(sliderValue);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and I set into jwc file:
> >>>>>>>> <parameter name="startRow" required="no" cache="true"
> >>>>>>>> default-value="ognl:0"/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Who can help me please ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thx, kiuma
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to