I also am contemplating the move as well, what I can't do again is
invest as much time and effort as I did in Tapestry 4, and then have to
do it again sometime soon... I hope that Howard is true to his word and
that future upgrades to T5 will be backward compatible and not involve a
radical rework of the framework.
The truth be told I am only choosing Tapestry 5 because It is slightly
less work for me, if JSF was more integrated with eclipse I would go
that route instead.
Peter
Dan Adams wrote:
I'm in the same boat. We've got a number of applications and projects
(10+) as well as multiple component libraries built around T4. By moving
to T5 you really are moving to another framework; it's a rewrite, not an
upgrade, and you should just consider it along with the other
frameworks. But after digging into T5 I'm convinced it's the way to go
and that it's going to make life real hard for the other frameworks.
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 08:17 -0700, Josh Joy wrote:
Hi,
I thought I would put this out here...as a caution, not trying to start any flames here, just a logical question...
Currently I'm using Tapestry 4.0.2....I was curious if anyone else was in the same position as I, basically I'm looking to upgrade to T5. However, considering the lack of a compelling migration plan to T5, I was curious if anyone else has considered the benefits/costs of going to Tapestry5 vs another web framework?
Thanks,
Josh
--
Peter Stavrinides
Albourne Partners (Cyprus) Ltd
Tel: +357 22 750652
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Please visit http://www.albourne.com/email.html for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
