+1

Just tried an upgrade from 4.1.1 (large app) and it went more smoothly than
I expected. A few OGNL and EventListener issues here and there, not too
difficult to fix.
When I have time, I'll post the OGNL issues I noticed (all related to the
way expressions like "prop1.prop2[index]" are handled - quick fix replace
with "prop1.getProp2(index)")
So whenever you start the vote, count me in ;-)

2007/5/28, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I think I'm going to start a vote to release it this week,  so if that
goes
well possibly this week.

On 5/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And...
> any idea when T4.1.2 will be released. I'm currently (re)evaluating
T4.1+
> as one of our predominant (web)frameworks - currently we already use
> T3/T4.0.2 quite frequently.
>
> -J.
>
> > Ok, thanks....
> >
> > But what does this mean exactly, in terms of how I specify the
> @Component?
> > Should I (still) use: @Component(type="components/Feedback")
> > or something different?
> >
> > Suppose I would have bundled these components into a Tapestry library
-
> > would that have changed something, or is this not comparable from
using
> a
> > Component as part of your application, so without libraries?
> >
> > This 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT contains a fix, for something I guess - right?
> > Can I use 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with JDK1.4, provided I decide not to use
> > annotations?
> >
> > Thanks again
> > -J.
> >
> >> Use 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT.
> >>
> >> On 5/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Anybody have a clue for me?
> >>>
> >>> -J.
> >>>
> >>> > First...
> >>> >
> >>> > I had some components specified in a directory
> >>> (<ctxroot>/components).
> >>> A
> >>> > couple of components had an "empty" component specification file
> >>> (.jwc)
> >>> -
> >>> > so I tried to use @ComponentClass on the component so I don't need
> >>> the
> >>> > .jwc file any longer.
> >>> >
> >>> > A page class in my application first used the .jwc'd component
like
> >>> so:
> >>> >
> >>> >   @Component(type="components/Feedback")
> >>> >   public abstract Feedback getFeedback();
> >>> >
> >>> > Question:
> >>> >
> >>> > How should I specify @ComponentClass and/or @Component annotation,
> so
> >>> the
> >>> > component is properly spotted when the page loads? - currently I
> have
> >>> been
> >>> > unable to. Remember the <ctxroot>/components folder only contains
> the
> >>> > component's html template.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > -J.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jesse Kuhnert
> >> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
> >>
> >> Open source based consulting work centered around
> >> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

Reply via email to