Quoting Lobanov Igor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Considering all of these, decision to use "pure HTML" templates looks like completely arbitrary and the matter of taste of Mr. Howard Lewis Ship. However I suppose I missed an important point here, so I would be very grateful if somebody shed light on this issue for me.
First of all, why wouldn't you want to use pure HTML templates? What are the benefits of using something else or even something new? Even though I (almost) never look at the templates using a special html editor or browser, there are two advantages: 1) If your editor knows about html (and most editors do), it will support you correctly. 2) You do not need to learn yet another thing. And you can also use this mechanism to generate other doctypes which are similar enough to html. Regards, Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
