Ah good good..

I'm not sure if it was announced yet or not but I'll probably be integrating
the new 0.9 version of dojo in a 4.2 tapestry release.  The internal
bickering is done and the performance / no code bloat people have won.  The
library has also been broken up into three modules to make things easier for
whatever your greatest interest is.

Needless to say the performance of that version is about as good as it can
be. (not to mention size of download) It'll be exciting playing with it
soon!

On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> What do you mean by forbidden? And also by changing page
> properties in an XHR request?
>
> I do this quite often myself so maybe it's just a matter of
> ~when~ you try to change the properties.

Oops, silly mistake in the component. It works perfectly well.

>
> p.s. Have you guys noticed any performance gains? Besides
> ognl I've been squeezing every millisecond out that I can via
> yourkit profiler. It's almost in a state where I don't think
> there's a whole lot more I can do to make it faster but I'm
> sure there is...
>

Rendering time is generally very fast. I've absolutely no issues with
that (never had, to be honest, compared to DB- and network- roundtrip
times (some 100ms), tapestry's rendering time was always negligible).
My biggest performance-"issue" is dojo-initialisation on page-reload. At
least I think it's that. Firebug tells me that about 1000ms are spent in
dojo.loaded. Some 900 ms of these seem to come from
buildWidgetFromParseTree.

I don't really know whether there's something which can be done about
this - it's not really a problem for us. Maybe it's just the price to
pay for some the really snappy XHR requests ...

Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

Reply via email to