Ah...Ok. Thanks for the additional info.

I think the new spec resource type change is here to stay, so it's just
matter of cleaning up whatever pieces used to work the old way.  The overall
result being that Tapestry no longer ignores classpath resources (except for
assets / things it has always handled) in a way that makes any resource
resolution done globally work whether people stick things in the classpath /
context / mixture of the two.

On 5/7/07, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Fair enough, it has to do with the way we handle client-specific
functionality. Eclipse copies everything, templates, .class files, and
.properties files to the classpath that Jetty uses (for local
deployments). We have a separate process that builds the context for us
that includes client-specific overrides of the templates and .properties
files. So, one client might have a different version of AssetEdit.html
than the default AssetEdit.html, for example, and we want that
client-specific version to get displayed. This is why it was a problem
for us that Tapestry tried to search the classpath for templates first
before checking the context.

I realize this is very specific to our setup but since Tapestry used to
check the context first for templates and .properties files anyway it
hasn't been a problem up until these changes started taking place.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 5:10 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: 4.1.2 snapshot changes 4-20 to 4-30

Right....I get that it's looking in the classpath first - but why is
that a
problem ?

On 5/7/07, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As an example, we have a component
> collective.md.ui.components.AssetEdit. For the NLS keys on that
> component, we want Tapestry to look for AssetEdit.properties under the
> context root/WEB-INF/app before it looks under the class path
> root/collective/md/ui/components. This is the behavior Tapestry used
to
> have but now it looks on the classpath first.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:51 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: 4.1.2 snapshot changes 4-20 to 4-30
>
> It's fine, report things as much as you like. Spec resolution logic
has
> changed so it makes sense that there are side effects.
>
> What is the exact problem (expected vs. actual) happening now? I know
> generally what you mean but properties get resolved by a completely
> different service so the patterns are different.
>
> On 5/7/07, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Our templates are still getting resolved on WEB-INF/app just fine,
but
> I
> > just found out we have a problem with NLS .properties files getting
> > resolved that is the same as the template resolution problem.
> >
> > So it looks like Tapestry is now looking on the classpath first for
> > .properties files whereas it used to look on the context first
> > (specifically for us this would also be WEB-INF/app). Would it be
> > possible to change this back to look at the context first like it
used
> > to?
> >
> > Sorry to bother with this yet again!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

Reply via email to