Joshua Jackson-3 wrote: > > I think creating Tapestry security module would be nice since Acegi is > too tightly coupled with Spring. >
Acegi is quite powerful, flexible and support a large number of user databases. It would be a big effort to build something similar. You don't have to use Spring in your application when you want to use Acegi. You simply create Acegi's configuration and forget that you in fact are declaring stuff in a Spring application context. -- http://www.stephan-schwab.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-%2B-Acegi-tf3670480.html#a10279618 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
