I like the idea, but only if someone active on the project has admin rights...Which no one does right now. So it could be that we need to move Tacos somewhere else.
On 3/16/07, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no problem with Tacos for this, as long as the current developers > of Tacos are ok with opening the doors of svn to many more developers. I > think a restructure of file structure would be needed and some stronger > guidelines would have to be written, but i think it could work. > > Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > > I mostly just wanted to edit the subject line so we don't keep > > treading all over Jeromes announcement. > > > > I agree...The current site + demo do tend to be ajax driven, but there > > was a glimmer of hope that we'd be able to support more services and > > other things as well...Don't let my opinion sway anyone from starting > > whichever projects they like of course, I'll support all of them > > either way. ;) > > > > Speaking of Tacos, I think it'd be nice if at a minimum Andreas had > > admin support on it finally. What do you say Viktor? > > > > On 3/15/07, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I wouldn't tie tacos to ajax that closely... > >> > >> Renaming tacos-core to tacos-ajax and adding a whole bunch of new > >> modules > >> + a few more devs is certainly a way forward. I guess Viktor can help > >> with > >> the accounts, > >> or perhaps give us access to do that. > >> > >> Tacos already has 4 and 4.1 specific sections. So, why not join? > >> > >> > >> > >> On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Jérôme BERNARD wrote: > >> > > On 3/16/07, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I've been thinking a little about the fact that Tapestry doesn't > >> really > >> > >> have a place for the general community to use as a home for > >> components, > >> > >> services and Tapestry related stuff that may be useful to others. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think this is why tapestry-contrib was created, but it being > >> under > >> > >> Apache it doesn't really provide the freedom for the general > >> community > >> > >> to join as developers and really get theirs hands dirty. > >> > >> So, i'm thinking something like a new project hosted in > >> sourceforge or > >> > >> javaforge or something like that. The project should be managed > >> by a > >> > >> Tapestry developer. Still, everyone that wanted to contribute, > like > >> > >> Jerome, would be made a developer and would access to svn. I > >> have some > >> > >> ideas on this but before i share them, does this sound stupid ? > >> > > > >> > > No. Sounds fine. > >> > > Maybe create a specific T4, T4.1 and T5 sections though so that > >> users > >> > > can figure out which components they can use. > >> > That's the idea. Special conventions and infrastructure would have > >> to be > >> > built to allow this to work correctly. > >> > > > >> > >> PS - Sorry for stealing the thread.... > >> > > > >> > > No problem, after all, even though I can host my work on my own > >> > > servers, an "official" home for this puppy would probably be better > >> > > :-) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Jérôme > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr > >> Tapestry / Tacos developer > >> Open Source / JEE Consulting > >> > > > > > -- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / JEE Consulting
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
