This reply is a bit off topic, but I thought <tag/> was perfectly acceptable, and actually recommended, especially for tags that usually have no close like <br>. I've never seen a </br> (doesn't make a lot of sense), but I have been told to use <br />. I thought some versions of Dreamweaver point this out to you. Some option about well formatted XML.
As for the OP, was this only a Tomcat 5 versus 5.5 problem, or a combination of Tomcat version and Tap version? Which Tap version are you using? Were you using J 1.5? (have any annotations?) Dan On 2/8/07, Daniel Tabuenca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strange. When I see errors like this the first thing I typically think is weird errors in your javascript or non-standard html. I used to run into strange bugs before because of doing non-standard html such as writing <span/> rather than <span></span>. Always use firebug or some other development verification tool to verify that your html/css/javascript etc... are valid, especially if things work in one browser but not another. On 2/8/07, Josh Joy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I checked my tomcat configuration, and on the box I > had tomcat 5 > installed rather than tomcat 5.5 > After reinstalling, the problem disappeared. > > Thanks, > Josh > > Josh Joy wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm having an odd situation pop up...I have a page > > which has several > > directlinks on it. The page shows search results, > and > > the directlinks > > are basically new query terms, ie will basically > link > > back to the same > > page just different data. Each of these directlinks > > invoke a listener > > and pass a parameter to it. > > > > The issue I'm seeing, is that on the initial page > > load, all the > > directlinks seems to be working. However, only in > > firefox, when I click > > the directlink again, the listener is not invoked (I > > also added debug > > statements to the method and see no entry) and all I > > see instead is a > > blank html page. Though, when I do this in Internet > > Explorer, everything > > works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this? The > > only thing I can > > think of is that my URL is too long and firefox > can't > > handle it and ie > > can? Though when I look at the url on the initial > page > > load and > > subsequent hits, it seems to be the exact same? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Josh > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
