This reply is a bit off topic, but I thought <tag/> was perfectly
acceptable, and actually recommended, especially for tags that usually
have no close like <br>.
I've never seen a </br> (doesn't make a lot of sense), but I have been
told to use <br />.  I thought some versions of Dreamweaver point this
out to you.  Some option about well formatted XML.

As for the OP, was this only a Tomcat 5 versus 5.5 problem, or a
combination of Tomcat version and Tap version?  Which Tap version are
you using?  Were you using J 1.5?  (have any annotations?)

Dan

On 2/8/07, Daniel Tabuenca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strange. When I see errors like this the first thing I typically think
is weird errors in your javascript or non-standard html. I used to run
into strange bugs before because of doing non-standard html such as
writing <span/> rather than <span></span>. Always use firebug or some
other development verification tool to verify that your
html/css/javascript etc... are valid, especially if things work in one
browser but not another.


On 2/8/07, Josh Joy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I checked my tomcat configuration, and on the box I
> had tomcat 5
> installed rather than tomcat 5.5
> After reinstalling, the problem disappeared.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
>
> Josh Joy wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm having an odd situation pop up...I have a page
> > which has several
> > directlinks on it. The page shows search results,
> and
> > the directlinks
> > are basically new query terms, ie will basically
> link
> > back to the same
> > page just different data. Each of these directlinks
> > invoke a listener
> > and pass a parameter to it.
> >
> > The issue I'm seeing, is that on the initial page
> > load, all the
> > directlinks seems to be working. However, only in
> > firefox, when I click
> > the directlink again, the listener is not invoked (I
> > also added debug
> > statements to the method and see no entry) and all I
> > see instead is a
> > blank html page. Though, when I do this in Internet
> > Explorer, everything
> > works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this? The
> > only thing I can
> > think of is that my URL is too long and firefox
> can't
> > handle it and ie
> > can? Though when I look at the url on the initial
> page
> > load and
> > subsequent hits, it seems to be the exact same?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Josh
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to