I'm still troubled by the fact that nobody has come up with an answer to
this:
Is vi better than emacs or is it the other way around?
Martin
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:53:44 +0100, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jesse,
This comment of yours that Wicket, in its current form, is technically
inferior doesn't hold water for me. Can you cite concrete reasons why you
think so?
And when I read your comment that they get beaten up a lot I decided to
go
goggle and find out what that means and could see that the only bashing
on
Wicket was based on their abuse of the session but this I read in the
link
to the article I posted earlier that they are solving this issue by using
the hard disk.
Sorry, but I like fair discussions.
Emmanuel
On 12/20/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would Tapestry be losing any kind of battle because one person
wrote an email saying they "recommend" using Wicket?
When Wicket is actually technically / some other version of better
that I can measure I'll admit it but I'm obviously biased towards
Tapestry so my opinions are highly suspect.
Good for them for getting some good press. They get beaten up a lot so
I think it's good that some positive articles are floating around out
there for them.
On 12/20/06, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I came across this article
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2006/12/wicket-vs-springmvc-and-jsf and
thought
> probably someone here could comment. Is Tapestry really losing the
battle
> against Wicket?
>
> Emmanuel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
