Hello!
If a component is without a jwc file, why cannot it be declared
explicitly in the library/application file?
Like:
<component-type type="SomeComponent"
class="com.example.SomeComponent" />
IMHO this explicit declaration would be a more natural extension of the
framework than using component-class-packages:
- The extensive use of jwc-less components _may_ result in empty library
files. How would a user instantly see which components are exactly part
of that library?
- Probably it's a bad design decision but 2 libraries may share the same
package.
- How would an automatic component doc generation tool / wysiwyg
designer know exactly which components belong to a given library? For
such tools it _must_ be explicitly specified which components are part
of the library, then why not do that once in the .library/.application file?
I would remove the "component-class-packages" configuration option and
prefer the above explicit declaration.
What do you think?
Regards:
Norbi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
