The discussion isn't really about the message changes. It was just sparked by them. The discussion is about the general philosophy of framework design, developer vs end-user support, versioning and backwards compatibility, documentation, and the direction of tapestry development into the future. The validation message change was just one small example that happened to touch on all of those areas.
--sam On 12/3/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There certainly is a lot of discussion going on for what my naive mind sees as only 2-3 validation strings. (which I'd be happy to revert back to the old way) If there are other more specific grievances people have I'd love to hear them. More so than the typical "unsocial nerd" I have an especially hard time interpreting hints/feelings/etc so to help me better understand I just need people to be very specific about any problems they encounter. An added bonus would be a few submissions in JIRA to help me remember. (as I'm not currently aware of any such issues filed yet) On 12/3/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snipped> -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
