Not yet, I'm finding it hard to find spare time, and since I'd have to understand the new Annotation stuff in order to do the backport, I'm considering adopting TP4 instead.
But I still think backporting BeanForm is a very interesting project, I haven't quit on it yet. Regards, Dario On 10/4/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you ever make any progress on this? thanks, Mark Mark J. Stang Senior Engineer/Architect office: +1 303.468.2900 mobile: +1 303.507.2833 Ping Identity -----Original Message----- From: Darío Vasconcelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 9:34 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: BeanForm for TP3? Thanks Daniel, I didn't recognize the title of my own post (duh!) and didn't notice you had replied to it. I will search the list and try to do the backport. Losing automatic validations and other stuff doesn't worry me that much; I'm assembling a team of Tapestry newbies for a project I'm starting and they're having a hard time climbing the learning curve... so I thought maybe BeanForm would speed development, if not helped them to understand TP a little more Regards, Dario On 9/20/06, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have plans to backport it to Tap3, mainly because I don't use Tap3 > and because I don't have any experience using Tap3. > > There has been some interest from others on this list in doing a backport > (search the list), so you might want to get together to tackle it. It's > Apache2-licensed, so nothing stops you. The only thing is that the next > version or two will still be pretty large improvements over previous > iterations, so keeping in sync with the original codebase might be an issue. > > I assume you realize that you'd have to eliminate some of the nicer features > (like automatic validation generation based on annotations) in order to > target older JDKs. > > Take care, > > Daniel > > > On 9/20/06, Darío Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > since recently someone mentioned the BeanForm component, I've been > > reading about it and wondering if there's a version for Tapestry 3, > > because I'm still stuck with old JDKs and app servers... > > > > In case there isn't such thing, would a backport be possible? Too much > > hard work? I haven't really gotten into all the annotation and > > HiveMind stuff and it looks kinda complicated from here... > > > > Regards, > > > > Dario > > > > > > -- > > Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch. > > -- W.C. Fields > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch. -- W.C. Fields --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch. -- W.C. Fields --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
