Are you testing your app against a local test db like hypersonic/mysql ? I should think that you would weed out all the trivial blunders if you get a local db working, or even an in memory db first.
"Vinicius Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello there! I still did not gave up OC4J 10.1.3 (well, I'd love to, > but my boss wont let me). > So, just to fresh-up memories, I get a nasty exception when I deploy > my app on oracle AS: > > 06/08/22 23:23:51 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: argument type > mismatch > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494) > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > org.apache.hivemind.service.impl.LoggingInterceptorFactory.instantiateInterceptor(LoggingInterceptorFactory.java:290) > 06/08/22 23:23:51 > org.apache.hivemind.service.impl.LoggingInterceptorFactory.createInterceptor(LoggingInterceptorFactory.java:255) > > Ok, so I start debuging the app on both tomcat and Oracle: > > Here's the snippet I was debugging inside the LogginInterceptorFactory: > > private Object instantiateInterceptor(InterceptorStack stack, > Class interceptorClass) > throws Exception > { > Object stackTop = stack.peek(); > > Constructor c = interceptorClass.getConstructors()[0]; > > return c.newInstance(new Object[] { stack.getServiceLog(), > stackTop }); <- point of problem > } > > Well below it's a "toString" of each of the variables involved: > > Tomcat: > stack > =InterceptorStackImpl[contribution=ServiceInterceptorContributionImpl[factoryServiceId=hivemind.LoggingInterceptor > parameters=null precedingInterceptorIds=null > followingInterceptorIds=null name=null] interfaceClass=interface > org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser top=<PooledProxy for > tapestry.parse.SpecificationParser(org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser)>] > > interceptorClass = lass $ISpecificationParser_10d3ecd54a4 > > stackTop = <PooledProxy for > tapestry.parse.SpecificationParser(org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser)> > > c = public > $ISpecificationParser_10d38c5277a(org.apache.commons.logging.Log,$ISpecificationParser_10d38c52779) > > stack.getServiceLog = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > OC4J > stack = > InterceptorStackImpl[contribution=ServiceInterceptorContributionImpl[factoryServiceId=hivemind.LoggingInterceptor > parameters=null precedingInterceptorIds=null > followingInterceptorIds=null name=null] interfaceClass=interface > org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser top=<PooledProxy for > tapestry.parse.SpecificationParser(org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser)>] > > interceptorClass = class $ISpecificationParser_10d38ce04a4 > > stackTop = <PooledProxy for > tapestry.parse.SpecificationParser(org.apache.tapestry.parse.ISpecificationParser)> > > c = public > $ISpecificationParser_10d38c89a9b(org.apache.commons.logging.Log,$ISpecificationParser_10d38c89a9a) > > stack.getServiceLog = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Well, I got stuck because, all the variables seems to be the same > type, hence, how could a type mismatch could be happening. > > I couldn't find a way to figure out the interfaces of the stackTop. > > Well I hope this piece of information would give an idea for the gurus > or hivemind/tapestry to give me a hand on how to solve this. > > I really need to get it working on 10.1.3 :( > > My best regards > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
