Oh what a familiar theme we weave.... I wasn't very happy with the way we had to do certain things in tacos the first time around, so I'm trying as much as possible to not let myself "apply tacos" to Tapestry as much as possible.
That being said, I have added a few key services which tacos could very easily use to replace the core functionality aspects of things. Generally speaking I tried to make the tacos components act/look as much like their Tapestry counterparts to help ease the learning curve when going from Tapestry - > Tacos, so I think the same will be true when going from Tacos -> Tapestry. AjaxEventSubmit is a very powerful/nice component, but I've always considered it an "abomination" in terms of design. I'm much happier with @EventListener. I'm still not sure I like the idea of the standard parameter set "updateComponents/effects/etc" but we'll see. Maybe there really isn't going to be a clear and victorious winner for these things. Like I said in a previous posting though, I've only laid down the internal support necessary to do these things so far. ..Now is more the time for component developers/users of tacos to start thinking about how they've been doing things so far and what might make things feel/seem more intuitive. I think EventListener is really the only "official" new thing that I'm happy with the design of. (leaving out effects/what to update/etc on purpose) Either way the end result can't be too radical(for T4 at least ;) ). It should hopefully be based on existing concepts/tasks that every day Tapestry users go through with simple extensions of those concepts where it makes sense. (and with minimal effort/typing..I hate typing) On 8/2/06, Karthik N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm also very keen to know the answer to this. Considering that Tap 4.1 is "round-the-corner", we're wondering whether to go ahead and use Tacos in our projects, and be able to refactor then with minimal effort when they become a part of Tapestry 4.1? Also any Tacos components that might get deprecated? Essentially we want to make our applications 4.1 friendly ... Any pointers/answers would be of most help! Thanks!! On 8/2/06, Murthy Parthasarathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All. > > If I have a Tapestry 4.0 application, that uses Tacos, what will > be > the effort involved in moving this app to Tapestry 4.1? Are Tacos > components going to be available as-is, or will there be a lot of > changes needed to the existing components? > > i.e. Should we limit ourselves from not using Tacos in 4.1? > > Cheers > Murthy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks, Karthik
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
