It sounds like the non-intuitive nature of the annotation could cause enough confusion that it warrents a bug report.
Please file it as being against 4.0.2 to help me. On 6/2/06, Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm, ok? So is this a bug or not? What is the purpose of @[EMAIL PROTECTED] if the behaviour is like this? 2006/5/28, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It sounds like a bug to me. Can you file this in jira ? > > On 5/27/06, Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When using @Persist and @InitialValue on the same property the value > > is not persisted. > > The only value returned from the property is the initial value. > > It seems like that when the initial value is set right before the page > > is returned to the pool, the persistent value is also set to the > > initial value. > > > > The expected behaviour, I think, is that the property will return the > > initial value the first time it is used, and then, after that, the > > persistent value should be returned. > > > > I have seen this question before on the list, but no real answer. > > What is the expected behaviour? > > > > -- > > /ted > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Jesse Kuhnert > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer > > Open source based consulting work centered around > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. > > -- /ted --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
