+1
There's nothing wrong with the current logo. I like it.
On Sat, 20 May 2006 15:22:03 +0300, Borut Bolčina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Chandler pravi:
On Friday 19 May 2006 11:52, Detlef Schulze wrote:
First of all I would like to state that I am quite happy with the logo
as it is now and I do not see any need for a change.
I was wondering why there was a sudden rush to change the existing logo
too.
I like the existing one.
I guess it was a reaction on this green unicorn. It came as a shock, at
least to me. I am ok with an existing one too.
Second, and I really do not want to insult anybody, there are already
lots of open source projects that have logos that may cause eye cancer.
If I have learned one thing about graphic design, then it is that this
is a task that should be done by professional designers and definitely
not by developers. The same applies to java development done by graphic
designers.
Also, unless there is a clear statement of the values that the logo is
there
to promote, a good graphic artist hasn't got the right information to
work
with.
My point also.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
