Maybe on second thought....Since I've already gone through all the trouble of making sure and confirming how they've done it I'll just make sure it gets into tap5 instead.(i've been working with Rhino a lot lately developing various js tools) It's not very hard to compile java classes into javascript using rhino so...I dunno.....we'll see..
On 5/20/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's definitely some very cool technology, as much as I hate to admit it.... I downloaded and took apart as much as I could when it came out, very clever stuff! They've basically created a sort of browser equivalent to java. Not literally, and not on their own of course. Rhino has been around for a fairly long time now, but what they did with it is just crazy. The deployed JS that comes with your "compiled" application is the exact amount needed to run it, no more and no less. Comparing my background history I'd have to say that I probably have more facless/native gui experience than web as well. The API's are of course familiar. A lot of rhino api stuff made it into the public facing portions(which is equivalent to saying the browser API.,.heh), along with normal GUI-ish type things you'd expect. So, I feel happy in knowing that the direction tap5 is going in is exactly where it should be, but sad at the same time because I almost don't know what to do now. Why try and re-invent the wheel? hmmmm On 5/19/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Very sweet. If this had existed a few years ago the number of web > frameworks in java would be much less than it is today. > > I finally got it running yesterday (my fault - no free time) and > lickety split I had converted some simple Tapestry stuff we have a > work here. Nothing complete mind you but for myself, an old Java GUI > programmer, the learning curve is infinitesmal compared > to....Tapestry. > > Even the demos are easily modified without too much trouble. Being > able to debug it like a normal Java GUI program is simply amazing. > > Way back when I found the learning curve of Tapestry hard for reasons > that are probably different from those most find today. I was coming > out of Swing land and had only a few months experiences (ok a year) > with servlet/jsp programming (no struts). Sliding back into the GUI > model programming is nothing to me. > > It will be interesting to hear how developers with only web experience > find the GWT learning curve. > > But, all new things are cooler than the old things and it remains to > be seen if one will hit the wall once one reaches the limits of GWT. > But so far..WOW! > > As for integrating GWT widgets into Tapestry..I can't give an opinion. > I'm not up enough on the hard work Jesse et all have been doing with T > 4.1. > > Geoff > > PS. [OT]it's very interesting that the devtime tool is an Eclipse RCP > app using SWT. > > On 5/17/06, Peter Svensson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, this is so sweet. Who will be the first to make this work with > > Tapestry/Tacos?? > > > > http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/ > > > > Cheers, > > PS > > > > > > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
