On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:38:19PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:16:24PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > > Note that when status acquires the lock it has to repeat the timestamp > > check, it cannot be assumed that the timestamp is still broken, or that > > the file still exists, or that it is still a file, etc. > > Yes, that's why I said the timestamp would need to be checked again. > Of course, node kind etc. would need to be verified again as well.
Filed this idea as http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4162 Let's see if somebody wants to tackle it :)
