On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:45:10 -0700
Imam Toufique wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> 
> I have not had a chance to work on the problem yet, I was busy with
> our stuff.  I will test again with your suggestion later this week.

I would suggest you look at other ways of doing this. Filing spam files
into a dedicated quarantine directory is IMO something that should be
done as a last resort. If spam can't be rejected then ideally is should
be made accessible to your mail client, so you can easily look for
missing mail and generally spot FPs.

This can be as simple as letting the spam through and having a mail
client filter move the spam to a different folder. It could involve
installing an MDA but it's not clear to me how that's any harder than
installing spamkiller from source.

spamkiller looks to have been been written for use with fetchmail; for
getmail it would be better if it had a "pass-through" mode where it
writes to stdout and exits with a return code. This would remove
the unnecessary dependency on a working  MTA, and allow getmail to
keep to the principle of not deleting remote email until after
locally delivery to the actual mailbox has completed successfully.




Reply via email to