On 20 Sep 2017, at 9:48, Chris wrote: > From the locate command I found these - https://pastebin.com/ECjZGX1M
AHA! Apparently Ubuntu (and Debian?) has a package called "dnsmasq-base" which is installed as a dependency of libvirt, which manages it independently and autocratically... 2 maybe useful links: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/TestingEnvironment#Tell_systemd-resolved_to_use_libvirt.27s_dnsmasq_for_VMs_only_.2817.04.2B-.29 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dnsmasq In short: this looks like a platform-specific situation grounded in trying to use one system for both spam filtering and running virtual machines. > I'm not sure what to do with those that are associated with /snap/core. No idea. Looks like an Ubuntuism I am unfamiliar with. > There's nothing in /etc/init.d for dnsmasq. No, there wouldn't be. THIS dnsmasq is libvirtd's pet. It should be irrelevant to your SpamAssassin resolution issues. As long as BIND's 'named' process is binding to 127.0.0.1:53 before dnsmasq tries to do so, you should only need to look at what named is doing.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
