On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 16.09.2017 um 16:27 schrieb Chris:
> >
> > named[1284]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolving
> > '165.170.166.108.iadb.isipp.com/A/IN': 168.150.251.35#53
> > named[1284]: host unreachable resolving
> > '165.170.166.108.iadb.isipp.com/A/IN': 67.227.190.38#53
> > named[1284]: SERVFAIL unexpected RCODE resolving
> > '165.170.166.108.iadb.isipp.com/A/IN': 67.227.187.192#53
> works here
>
> >
> > $ grep -ri isipp
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org
> > Binary file
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/30_text_pt_
> > br.c
> > f matches
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_te
> > sts.
> > cf:header __RCVD_IN_IADB eval:check_rbl('iadb-
> > firsttrusted',
> > 'iadb.isipp.com.')
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_te
> > sts.
> > cf:describe RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for
> > sender
> >
> > I notice that they're a 'pay for use' service or at least that's
> > what I
> > can see on their webpage.
> this is a WHITELIST and you pay for get listed, pay for use it would
> make no sense at all because in that case it becomes meaningsless
> and
> nobody would pay to get listed
>
Ok, I see now. That makes more sense to pay to get listed, not to use.
My mistake, I misread it.-- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft) 09:35:08 up 7 days, 17:03, 1 user, load average: 0.88, 0.83, 0.70 Description: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, kernel 4.10.0-33-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
