From: RW <[email protected]>
    
>On Sat, 6 May 2017 15:49:08 +0200
>Thore Boedecker wrote:

>> Over on my side, the receiving end of these emails, there is my
>> spamassassin. SA discovers the DKIM signature and is able to validate
>> this signature against the Yahoo server which is totally undesirable
>> in my opinion.

>SPF requires the mail to be sent out through designated hosts. A DKIM
>pass for the correct domain means that the email passed through a host
>with access to the signing key. DKIM provides better authorization than
>SPF.
 
RW is correct.  This email did not go through a Google mail server.  Looks
like the sender is using a mail client to send through Yahoo with the
intention to get someone to reply back to a gmail.com address.

Does anyone think it would be beneficial to extend the FreeMail plugin
to detect these headers having different sender and reply-to FREEMAIL
domains?

You need to properly train your Bayes since this email hit BAYES_00.  This
email was BCC'd which is another clue of spam in conjunction with the
FREEMAIL hits.

I bump up these FREEMAIL scores based on the masscheck results I saw
in the past:
score FREEMAIL_FROM 1.2
score FREEMAIL_REPLYTO 4.2
score FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT 1.2

Disclaimer: Adjust these scores to your liking as I have an SA block at 6.0.

Dave

Reply via email to