On Mon, 1 May 2017, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
> I'm seeing far too many legitimate bounces being tagged as spam
> because they are hitting stock SA rules, including bayes50 ...
On 30.04.17 12:25, John Hardin wrote:
BAYES_50 should have no real effect on the score of a message, because
that's Bayes saying "insufficient data for an opinion".
score BAYES_50 0 0 2.0 0.8
not that I disagree with this score, but it does not have 0 score...
I was thinking 0.001 informative, like BAYES_20 and _40 have. My error,
apologies.
I'm surprised that "insufficient data" is biased towards spam, but perhaps
that's based on an assumption that a properly trained Bayes will reliably
detect your regular hammy message traffic and anything it doesn't
recognize is therefore probably a new form of spam it hasn't been trained
on yet.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If guns kill people, then...
-- pencils miss spel words.
-- cars make people drive drunk.
-- spoons make people fat.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7 days until the 72nd anniversary of VE day
