Hi Tom, Thanks for your explanation, I hadn't appreciated that there was higher precision being hidden.
Thanks, Geoff > On 25 Apr 2017, at 09:39, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: > > Hoi Geoff, > > The scores actually have a precision of 3 numerals after the dot. The > actual score of NO_RELAYS = -0.001. While rounding would still give you > 3.0 as final score for this message, the actual score is below 3. > > When you would have a ham/spam threshold at exactly 3, and the final > score would say '3.0', you would be asking why a message with score 3 > wasn't blocked. So the 2.9 indicates that it's not 3 ;) > > Kind regards, > > Tom > >> On 25-04-17 10:27, Geoff Soper wrote: >> X-Spam-Status: No, Score=2.9 >> >> X-Spam-Report: >> >> * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP >> >> * 3.0 GS_NO_RLYS_PHP No description available. >> >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on >> >> server.alphaworks.co.uk <http://server.alphaworks.co.uk> >> >> >> Can anyone explain why this isn't scoring 3.0? >> >> :) >> >
