On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:23:07 -0500 Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:45:07 +0000 > Vincent Fox <vb...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > > Come on, look at the datestamps on the addresses in that list! > > Plenty from 2009. > > The reason they datestamp the addresses is so that sites making use of > the list can determine on their own when data is stale enough to > ignore. > > I do agree that they should auto-remove anything older than about 90 > days since some sites using the list probably ignore the datestamp. > I will bring it up with the admins.
FWIW I ran that list against 3k spams received from late 2015 onwards. I got 2 hits on 2 separate addesses both timestamped with 2012.
