On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:59:13 +0100 Gregor Uwe Esterweil wrote:
> >>> Is there something similar for spamassassin? > >> razor, pyzor, DCC > > RBLs and rule updates as well. > Do I understand you correctly that, if somebody runs a > spamassassin-instance, this instance is doing reports to a central > network which distributes the information to any other spamassassin > instance. > > I thought there's only an automatic oneway connection with the use of > RBLs and rule-updates. > > Is the contribution when using razor/pyzor optional? > > How does the contribution to razor/pyzor and dcc work? How is decided > which mail leads to an information transfer to the main systems? dcc is the only one that's truly automatic because it's really a bulk mail test that's based on the number of look-ups. spamc and the spamassassin script allow spam to be reported to Pyzor, Razor and SpamCop at the same time that it's trained locally into Bayes. Some SA users periodically run current rules against their corpora of spam and ham to generate information used for rule scoring and QA.
