On 21.01.17 11:20, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm looking to understand the actual mechanism whereby pyzor tells sa
it thinks a message is spam.
What does sa look for.
that's problem of Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor plugin.
My sa setup allows sa to insert X-Spam headers and then procmail looks
for certain of those
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
spama_spam_tr.in
So does pyzor insert something I can tell procmail to lookfor or does
pyzor somehow tell SA a msg is spam and then sa inserts something I
can tell procmail to look for?
What is the actual mechanism between pyzor and sa. How do they
converse.
well, SA does use the pyzor output. It's quite irelevant how.
The point is, when pyzor reports message as spam, SA increases its score, so
the probability of mail being detected as spam is higher.
How is it all found by procmail?
exactly as you use above. It also does not matter if you use pyzor, all
checks SA uses are evaluated that way.
Simply install pyzor (razor, dcc, ...), activate SA plugins and let SA do
the job.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist
"So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton
