On 03/12/2016 19:23, RW wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 14:18:38 +0000
geoff.sa_users_161...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
Ah, I think I've been making an invalid assumption here...
Because every one of these messages had a UNPARSEABLE_RELAY and
nothing else, I thought that this issue was stopping any other tests
being applied. What I now realise (I think!) is that they're failing
no other tests because the majority of tests relate to the path the
message has taken to my mail server and without information on that,
all of those tests can't be applied. Is my revised understanding
correct?
Sort of, but it's a more like a significant minority. And if they
turned-off network tests it's much less significant. The received
headers that were there are of no interest anyway. It's just as
worrying that there was no Bayes result.
Some spam does hit few tests, do you have any that hits lots?
The spam that customer services commented on doesn't appear to be the
same one that that you posted. If the quoted one is external then there
must be at least one missing received header. Possibly Plesk is doing
something unusual, "(delivered via plesk_virtual service)" looks a
bit suspicious.
For what it's worth, this is the example I sent to support...
I'll look at Bayes now.
Thanks!
--- Begin Message ---
Dear <removed>, your payment was not processed due to the problem with
credentials.
Payment details are in the attached document.
Please check it out as soon as possible.
--- End Message ---
