Bill you are absolutely right...
i have modified it:
 urirhssub        MY_URIBL_BLACK  multi.uribl.com.        A   2 body            
   MY_URIBL_BLACK  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK') describe          
MY_URIBL_BLACK  URL listed in uribl.com score               MY_URIBL_BLACK  3
but still not working... 
maybe the function "check_uridnsbl" in the eval is considered a net check 
despite anything else... (it would make sense according to its name, i know, 
but...)
Thank to all trying to help me!!
PedroD

      From: Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
 To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> 
 Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 9:52 PM
 Subject: Re: Local mode with some URI checks. Possible??
  
On 3 Sep 2016, at 5:32, Pedro David Marco wrote:

> there is a Flag to indicate when a rule is net related or not, so my 
> understanding was thatas my rule did not have that flag, it could work 
> in local only mode.

BUT: URIBL_BLACK is not YOUR rule. It is your redefinition of a rule in 
the default set:

bigsky:updates_spamassassin_org root# grep -r URIBL_BLACK .
./25_uribl.cf:urirhssub      URIBL_BLACK    multi.uribl.com.        A  
  2
./25_uribl.cf:body            URIBL_BLACK    
eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK')
./25_uribl.cf:describe        URIBL_BLACK    Contains an URL listed in 
the URIBL blacklist
./25_uribl.cf:tflags          URIBL_BLACK    net
./25_uribl.cf:reuse          URIBL_BLACK
./30_text_pt_br.cf:lang pt_BR describe URIBL_BLACK Cont?m uma URL 
listada na blacklist URIBL
./50_scores.cf:score URIBL_BLACK 0 1.7 0 1.7 # n=0 n=2

So "your" rule is just restating exactly what that rule already was, but 
you gave it a new score and description. You did not give it a new 
tflags setting.


   

Reply via email to