Bill you are absolutely right...
i have modified it:
urirhssub MY_URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A 2 body
MY_URIBL_BLACK eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK') describe
MY_URIBL_BLACK URL listed in uribl.com score MY_URIBL_BLACK 3
but still not working...
maybe the function "check_uridnsbl" in the eval is considered a net check
despite anything else... (it would make sense according to its name, i know,
but...)
Thank to all trying to help me!!
PedroD
From: Bill Cole <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: Local mode with some URI checks. Possible??
On 3 Sep 2016, at 5:32, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> there is a Flag to indicate when a rule is net related or not, so my
> understanding was thatas my rule did not have that flag, it could work
> in local only mode.
BUT: URIBL_BLACK is not YOUR rule. It is your redefinition of a rule in
the default set:
bigsky:updates_spamassassin_org root# grep -r URIBL_BLACK .
./25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A
2
./25_uribl.cf:body URIBL_BLACK
eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK')
./25_uribl.cf:describe URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in
the URIBL blacklist
./25_uribl.cf:tflags URIBL_BLACK net
./25_uribl.cf:reuse URIBL_BLACK
./30_text_pt_br.cf:lang pt_BR describe URIBL_BLACK Cont?m uma URL
listada na blacklist URIBL
./50_scores.cf:score URIBL_BLACK 0 1.7 0 1.7 # n=0 n=2
So "your" rule is just restating exactly what that rule already was, but
you gave it a new score and description. You did not give it a new
tflags setting.
