I'm assuming that BAYES_ZERO is a meta of some sort. Would you also need to set priority on the other referenced rules, or does SA handle that?

Also, keep in mind that if you can make this work, you will effectively be speeding up the processing of mail that matches BAYES_ZERO (slightly), while slowing down the processing of all other mail. This is because SA will now have to wait for Bayes calculations before sending the DNS requests to check blacklists.

Bowie

On 8/30/2016 10:37 AM, Axb wrote:
shot in te dark:
what happens if you do

priority         BAYES_ZERO             -2000
shortcircuit     BAYES_ZERO             ham

On 08/30/2016 04:30 PM, Nicola Piazzi wrote:
And there is not a solution ?

Nicola Piazzi
CED - Sistemi
COMET s.p.a.
Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna - Italia
Tel.  +39 051.6079.293
Cell. +39 328.21.73.470
Web: www.gruppocomet.it



-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: li...@rhsoft.net [mailto:li...@rhsoft.net]
Inviato: martedì 30 agosto 2016 16:26
A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Shortcircuit work partially



Am 30.08.2016 um 16:21 schrieb Nicola Piazzi:
When i shortcircuit a rule not all other are bypassed

Here an example ...

Local.cf :
priority         BAYES_ZERO             -980
shortcircuit     BAYES_ZERO             ham

the dns stuff is fired asynchronous long before bayes is even evaluated

Spam report :
-0.03 ABUSIX_PRESENCE Contatto Anti-Abuse presente in abuse-contacts.abusix.org
-1.00 BAYES_ZERO Bayes Zero Percento Assoluto
0.10 C_RBL_ANTICAPTCHA Listed in dnsbl.anticaptcha.net
0.10 C_RBL_DNSRBL Listed in DnsRbl.org
0.20 C_RBL_KONSTANT Listed in bl.konstant.no
0.10 C_RBL_MEGARBL Listed in rbl.megarbl.net
0.10 C_RBL_NETUA Listed in dnsbl.net.ua
-0.30 C_RBL_NSZONES_WL NSZONES - WhiteList
0.10 C_RBL_SINGULAR Listed in singular.ttk.pte.hu
0.10 C_RBL_SWINOG_SPAM Listed in dnsrbl.swinog.ch.
0.10 C_RBL_UNSUBSCORE Listed in ubl.unsubscore.com
-100.00 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
-0.35 URIBL_HOSTKARMA_Y Dominio in HostKarma YellowList



Reply via email to