On 16.08.16 20:06, Marc Perkel wrote:
What I'm doing is looking for fingerprints in email that intersect
HAM and not in SPAM - which would be a HAM result.
If it matches SPAM and does NOT match HAM - then it's SPAM.
The magic is in the NOT matching on the other side.
so, if mail matches both hammy and spammy tokens (or token sets), you don't
classify at all?
So if I say to you, "Let's get some lunch" that's ham because
spammers never say that, but normal people do. So the way to test
what "spammers never say" is to store what they do say and see if
it's NOT in the list. (Thus the infinite set)
Similarly, there's only so many ways to misspell viagra, and good
email wouldn't have it spelled wrong.
Does that make sense?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer.
Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.
