On 8/15/2016 8:01 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-10.25 / 15.00]
WHITELIST_DMARC(-7.00)[google.com]
WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[google.com]
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]
CLAMAV_VIRUS_CLEAN(-2.00)[]
DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.25)[google.com]
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative, text/plain]
FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]
R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(0.00)[]
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[google.com]
HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_2(1.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Server: 127.0.0.1
X-Rspamd-Scan-Time: 0.22
X-Rspamd-Queue-ID: 654531BE12E
is what rspamd see them as, but its a spam, i can forward it to rule
maintainer in spamassassin on request
how to report it to dnswl now since i use rspamd and not spamassassin
any more
This is not the mailing list for rspamd or dnswl. How is SA involved in
this issue?
