Re: URIBL randomly not triggered for the same message

[Reindl Harald]

Am 06.07.2016 um 17:35 schrieb John Hardin:

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Paul Stead wrote:

On 06/07/16 16:16, John Hardin wrote:

 Does that cache-min-ttl also affect NXDOMAIN? Is it possible to
 configure different TTL for NXDOMAIN (relatively low) and positive
 results (relatively high)?

For this cache-max-negative-ttl exists :)

:) It's obvious I don't use unbound...

Reindl, does that approach help?

cache-min-ttl: 600
cache-max-ttl: 43200
cache-max-negative-ttl: 100

sounds good and at leat i don't get any error by using unbound-1.5.8-2.fc23.x86_64 and the follwoing settings when it works as expected it should lead in not so often expire heavily used crap domains without take too long for realize new listings and at least makes the problem nit so big as now thanks god then normal DNSBL/DNSWL are not affected becaus ethey are used also in prostscreen for weighting and so at the moment SA is using them the cache is always hot

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature