On Wednesday 29 June 2016 at 12:42:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.06.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Olivier:
> > Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> writes:
> >>
> >> he asked *exactly the same* with "dataset of source IP addresses of
> >> emails received" but for a ton of relations you just need that IP and a
> >> PTR combined with whois lookup to get relations one would not want to be
> >> public
> >
> > Your milleage may vary, but provided you have a large enough number of
> > users and you manage to send the corpus anonymously, all information you
> > give is that somewhere on Internet, a mail server did receive messages
> > from google.com and from hotmail.com and lists.oetiker.ch and also
> > gtzq.com sent you some spam.
>
> forget the big ones - just filter them out and look at the small ones
> where PTR/Sender is from the same domain, connect it to your destination
> domains which are easily to find out and voila you have
> comapny-to-company relations by looking at the business
All of this is assuming the original poster asked for the emails as well.
He didn't - he asked for a list of IP addresses - well, two lists, one of ham
and one of spam. He didn't ask for any information about the emails
themselves at all.
I quote from his original request:
"It would be great if somebody could give me a dataset of source IP addresses
of emails received by your network which have been marked as HAM/SPAM by
Spamassassin for the year 2016. I do not require the entire SPAM/HAM emails."
Regards,
Antony.
--
A user interface is like a joke.
If you have to explain it, it didn't work.
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
