On Sun, Jun 26, 2016, at 02:15 AM, Groach wrote:
> Am I right to think this implies that there is a setting or some other
> mechanism that stops rules that have a Zero score from being run in the
> first place? A flag or something? (I ask because I still have Zero score
> rule results run and included in the headers and in this case the
> FREEMAIL rule would still have been apparent). Could you explain please?
Yep.
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#scoring_options
score SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME n.nn [ n.nn n.nn n.nn ]
...
Setting a rule's score to 0 will disable that rule from running.
...
> (And why did your updates file have them as Zero scores? Have you
> worked out why?)
No clue. And looking at a couple of other installs, no such problem.
The only thing that caught my attention was that the update date of a couple
of files was different -- including the one with the freemail scores.
What I did not check b4 deleting & re-updating with a clean set of updates was
file corruption, and perms. But too late now, unfortunately. I checked my
update cron jobs, and they seem to be working fine now, too.
Jason
