On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt * grep for the uribl don't show any calluridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A body URIBL_LOCAL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL') describe URIBL_LOCAL Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist score URIBL_LOCAL 0.1 tflags URIBL_LOCAL net domains_only ____________________________________________with that two variants errors appear in the maillog while i don't get what's wrong with tell the return-code here - anyways, that confirms that the rule above seems not to be wrongJun 13 00:19:17 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2" is not valid for "uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2Jun 13 00:20:03 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net." is not valid for "uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net.
Did you "--lint" check the rules before you tried testing them?That 'SpamAssassin failed to parse line' error sounds like you've got a syntax error in there.
-- Dave Funk University of Iowa <dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527 #include <std_disclaimer.h> Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature