On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:

* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call

uridnsbl   URIBL_LOCAL  uribl.thelounge.net.  A
body       URIBL_LOCAL  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL')
describe   URIBL_LOCAL  Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
score      URIBL_LOCAL  0.1
tflags     URIBL_LOCAL  net domains_only
____________________________________________

with that two variants errors appear in the maillog while i don't get what's wrong with tell the return-code here - anyways, that confirms that the rule above seems not to be wrong

Jun 13 00:19:17 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2" is not valid for "uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2

Jun 13 00:20:03 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net." is not valid for "uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net.

Did you "--lint" check the rules before you tried testing them?

That 'SpamAssassin failed to parse line' error sounds like you've got a syntax error in there.


--
Dave Funk                                  University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu>        College of Engineering
319/335-5751   FAX: 319/384-0549           1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin            Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to