Re: why does that mail not get any bayes-classification

[David B Funk]

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 10.06.2016 um 23:52 schrieb RW:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:57:45 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:

see attachemnt, no bayes tag at all looks like a major bug somewhere

In the absence of any debug it's hard to say.

hence i attached the sample

It is possible for no tokens to make it through the selection, in which
case there is no result. That's more likely than normal in your case
since you don't train on headers.

if you would have looked at the message you would have seen that there is content and not only headers and it looks like the message has just incorrect mime-definitions (missing end headers) since thunderbird shows the attachment as well as the mail content that would be a way for spammers to completly trick out SA

There may be a bug but I don't it is in the SA distro.

I took your sample and fed it to my SA kit. First time thru it hit BAYES_50, I


So I'd say standard SA + Bayes works on that message. Somebody at your site may
have done some modifications to your SA that is causing you problems.


--
Dave Funk                                  University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu>        College of Engineering
319/335-5751   FAX: 319/384-0549           1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin            Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{

then did a "sa-learn --spam < /tmp/ignored_by_bayes_stripped.eml" and retested it. It then hit BAYES_999.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature