On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 00:38 +0000, David Jones wrote: > > Too bad we couldn't make SA do something very annoying and > more obvious when the URIBL_BLOCKED rule was hit. > I notice, rather to my surprise, that the SA Wiki doesn't seem to have an entry for the URIBL_BLOCKED rule. However, since people don't seem to have even run a web search or scanned the list archive before coming here for answers, I suppose they wouldn't look there either.
Martin
