On Tue, 31 May 2016 21:23:11 +0100 Paul Stead <paul.st...@zeninternet.co.uk> wrote:
> The implementation was undertaken from a personal interest - I asked > the question of what people thought of the implementation and the > impact to Bayes DB. I think what the "concepts" concept ends up doing is this: "concepts" are more-or-less equivalent to SpamAssassin heuristics. And instead of using SpamAssassin's genetic algorithm to figure out the most appropriate scores for each concept, you're letting Bayes tell you the strength of each concept. I do seem to recall a proposal to throw SpamAssassin test names into Bayes, which would be interesting... it would be fascinating to see the amount of agreement or divergence between the rules Bayes thinks are important and the rules the genetic algorithm weights heavily. Regards, Dianne.
