On 30 May 2016, at 15:07, Alex wrote:
Yeah, that's it exactly. Particularly overseas where it doesn't appear
NAT and/or submission are used as readily as they are here.
Am 31.05.2016 um 03:09 schrieb Bill Cole:
Irrelevant in this case because if you trust that header not to be an
intentionally deceptive lie, the receiving server claims the mail was
received with authentication, making it very unlikely that the message
is spam
On 31.05.16 10:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
you can not trust any header not written by your own MTA and hence
all that deep header parsing is nonsense with any score above 0.01 or
below -0.01
why? If someone fakes a clear spammy sign, I see no point in giving them
higher score.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer.
Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.
