Robert Boyl kirjoitti 8.4.2016 16:13:
> Hi, everyone
>
> Pls, do you get a good spam score on this? For us, no hits for spamassassin,
> etc.
>
> I checked in test sites such as http://spamcheck.postmarkapp.com/ and also
> very low score.
>
> Strange, as it does seem to have spammy words, etc... no?
>
> See:
>
> http://pastebin.com/EJH1eddN
The old plugin botnet still rocks on me, while most just can't and won't
use it... My bayes was clueless, as expected. But not 00 either..
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?106.51.133.155>]
1.5 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
[botnet0.8,ip=MTkyLjE2OC4xLjY2,maildomain=b2blistappenders.com,nordns]
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4918]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with
no rDNS
--
jarif.bit
